<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lilith.org/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lilith.org/blog</link>
	<description>Lilith Magazine: The Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:36:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spinoza and Cherry Ames by Marlene Cimons</title>
		<link>http://www.lilith.org/blog/2012/02/spinoza-and-cherry-ames/comment-page-1/#comment-88058</link>
		<dc:creator>Marlene Cimons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lilith.org/blog/?p=3199#comment-88058</guid>
		<description>Well, who knew? 
Mindy, I shunned Cherry Ames because, even as a child, it bothered me that she had to have a traditional woman&#039;s job and wasn&#039;t a doctor. I was a Nancy Drew girl all the way! I loved how she solved every case, outsmarting her boyfriend and her father every time. I also read every Hardy Boys mystery, because that&#039;s what my older brothers were reading and the books were in the house.  But that&#039;s another story...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, who knew?<br />
Mindy, I shunned Cherry Ames because, even as a child, it bothered me that she had to have a traditional woman&#8217;s job and wasn&#8217;t a doctor. I was a Nancy Drew girl all the way! I loved how she solved every case, outsmarting her boyfriend and her father every time. I also read every Hardy Boys mystery, because that&#8217;s what my older brothers were reading and the books were in the house.  But that&#8217;s another story&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Link Roundup: The Susan G Komen Backlash and Workplace Discrimination by Abortion in Israel, Contraception in the U.S. &#124;</title>
		<link>http://www.lilith.org/blog/2012/02/link-roundup-the-susan-g-komen-backlash-and-workplace-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-88057</link>
		<dc:creator>Abortion in Israel, Contraception in the U.S. &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lilith.org/blog/?p=3142#comment-88057</guid>
		<description>[...] in America. That these forces enter what should be safe spaces for women – such as the board of Komen—Race for the Cure, an organization presumably dedicated to women’s health – indicates a virus that retrograde [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in America. That these forces enter what should be safe spaces for women – such as the board of Komen—Race for the Cure, an organization presumably dedicated to women’s health – indicates a virus that retrograde [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spinoza and Cherry Ames by Robbie Miller Kaplan</title>
		<link>http://www.lilith.org/blog/2012/02/spinoza-and-cherry-ames/comment-page-1/#comment-88042</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbie Miller Kaplan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 01:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lilith.org/blog/?p=3199#comment-88042</guid>
		<description>Loved this post. Loved Cherry Ames too. Thanks for sharing your memories and your findings. How about Nancy Drew? Loved her too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved this post. Loved Cherry Ames too. Thanks for sharing your memories and your findings. How about Nancy Drew? Loved her too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spinoza and Cherry Ames by Dimple Ballesteros</title>
		<link>http://www.lilith.org/blog/2012/02/spinoza-and-cherry-ames/comment-page-1/#comment-88034</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimple Ballesteros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lilith.org/blog/?p=3199#comment-88034</guid>
		<description>Great explanation. I prefer to read it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1441326/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Martha&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great explanation. I prefer to read it <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1441326/" rel="nofollow">Martha</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spinoza and Cherry Ames by Susan Pober</title>
		<link>http://www.lilith.org/blog/2012/02/spinoza-and-cherry-ames/comment-page-1/#comment-88028</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Pober</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 21:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lilith.org/blog/?p=3199#comment-88028</guid>
		<description>I LOVED Cherry Ames. Now I&#039;m going to have to find them (we don&#039;t have them in the library where I work!) and re-read them. Thanks for the blog &amp; for stirring up old, but good, memories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVED Cherry Ames. Now I&#8217;m going to have to find them (we don&#8217;t have them in the library where I work!) and re-read them. Thanks for the blog &amp; for stirring up old, but good, memories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Modesty and Desire by Tara Bognar</title>
		<link>http://www.lilith.org/blog/2012/02/modesty-and-desire/comment-page-1/#comment-88025</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara Bognar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lilith.org/blog/?p=3117#comment-88025</guid>
		<description>Sigal - Thank you!

Josh - The simple fact that there are clothes rules for both men and women is at least a modicum of apparent egalitarianism and may well be a good starting place.  There are still so many differences though... I&#039;d be curious to hear where you&#039;re going with it!

Pesach - I think that we agree that Judaism encourages men to use their skills and talents in a way that benefits both themselves and their community, and/even if that puts them at the center of communal attention.

Drisha alum - Yay Drisha! First I will say that I absolutely agree that suppressing and undervaluing women&#039;s voices and leadership is a society-wide and Judaism-wide problem. That wasn&#039;t my focus here (although I did mention it in multiple places).

I appreciate R. Linzer&#039;s efforts, as I wrote in my last paragraph. But I think his words in the NYT article are actually inconsistent with his efforts to increase women&#039;s scope of public religious activity.

A reader of the New York Times who is not already very knowledgeable about the Jewish community and R. Linzer&#039;s corner of it would have no way of knowing that R. Linzer, who is identified at the end only as an &quot;Orthodox Rabbi&quot;, is actually working to encourage women&#039;s public roles - work that goes against the grain of other organizations that identify as Orthodox (e.g., Young Israel) as opposed to Ultra-Orthodox. On the other hand, a casual reader of my essay here might actually have a much more positive impression of R. Linzer&#039;s work in that regard.

As far as placing sexist norms in the same sentence as R. Linzer: I believe that I can respect R. Linzer and his work and still express significant disagreement with him about issues of gender and sexism. I don&#039;t really see where immaturity comes into it.

Finally, I am truly glad that your experiences do not reflect a restriction of your religious expression of Judaism to private arenas. There have always been exceptional Jewish women (exceptional by their intellect, luck, wealth, social standing, family connections, and often, by necessity, all of the above) for whom that has been the case - but I would argue that, both historically and today (in many communities),  that has not been the sociological or the ideological norm. I believe that to the extent that R. Linzer, or any of us, wants to effectively change that for the future - not just for exceptional women but for ordinary women as well - it must first be acknowledged without apologetics or obfuscation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigal &#8211; Thank you!</p>
<p>Josh &#8211; The simple fact that there are clothes rules for both men and women is at least a modicum of apparent egalitarianism and may well be a good starting place.  There are still so many differences though&#8230; I&#8217;d be curious to hear where you&#8217;re going with it!</p>
<p>Pesach &#8211; I think that we agree that Judaism encourages men to use their skills and talents in a way that benefits both themselves and their community, and/even if that puts them at the center of communal attention.</p>
<p>Drisha alum &#8211; Yay Drisha! First I will say that I absolutely agree that suppressing and undervaluing women&#8217;s voices and leadership is a society-wide and Judaism-wide problem. That wasn&#8217;t my focus here (although I did mention it in multiple places).</p>
<p>I appreciate R. Linzer&#8217;s efforts, as I wrote in my last paragraph. But I think his words in the NYT article are actually inconsistent with his efforts to increase women&#8217;s scope of public religious activity.</p>
<p>A reader of the New York Times who is not already very knowledgeable about the Jewish community and R. Linzer&#8217;s corner of it would have no way of knowing that R. Linzer, who is identified at the end only as an &#8220;Orthodox Rabbi&#8221;, is actually working to encourage women&#8217;s public roles &#8211; work that goes against the grain of other organizations that identify as Orthodox (e.g., Young Israel) as opposed to Ultra-Orthodox. On the other hand, a casual reader of my essay here might actually have a much more positive impression of R. Linzer&#8217;s work in that regard.</p>
<p>As far as placing sexist norms in the same sentence as R. Linzer: I believe that I can respect R. Linzer and his work and still express significant disagreement with him about issues of gender and sexism. I don&#8217;t really see where immaturity comes into it.</p>
<p>Finally, I am truly glad that your experiences do not reflect a restriction of your religious expression of Judaism to private arenas. There have always been exceptional Jewish women (exceptional by their intellect, luck, wealth, social standing, family connections, and often, by necessity, all of the above) for whom that has been the case &#8211; but I would argue that, both historically and today (in many communities),  that has not been the sociological or the ideological norm. I believe that to the extent that R. Linzer, or any of us, wants to effectively change that for the future &#8211; not just for exceptional women but for ordinary women as well &#8211; it must first be acknowledged without apologetics or obfuscation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Modesty and Desire by Drisha alum</title>
		<link>http://www.lilith.org/blog/2012/02/modesty-and-desire/comment-page-1/#comment-88012</link>
		<dc:creator>Drisha alum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lilith.org/blog/?p=3117#comment-88012</guid>
		<description>Tara--- a lot of what you are saying is reflective of general society, not just Jewish society.  It is the Orthodox, Conservative, and Reform rabbinate...I&#039;m not sure about the stats on Reconstructionist women rabbis.  Women are underpaid everywhere--- We have a disproportionate representation of men in leading positions in the business, political, and, yes, also the religious world.  Rabbi Linzer is someone who empowers women- he is not Young Israel, he is not haredi, he is not someone who is looking to keep women in the mikvah/home (examples which are NOT reflective of my experience as a Jewish woman...not in the least).  Rabbi Linzer is fighting the fight...for you...  It is unfair and immature to place a set of sexist norms in the same sentence as Rabbi Linzer.  He was writing for the NY Times...not for The Jewish Week or Lilith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tara&#8212; a lot of what you are saying is reflective of general society, not just Jewish society.  It is the Orthodox, Conservative, and Reform rabbinate&#8230;I&#8217;m not sure about the stats on Reconstructionist women rabbis.  Women are underpaid everywhere&#8212; We have a disproportionate representation of men in leading positions in the business, political, and, yes, also the religious world.  Rabbi Linzer is someone who empowers women- he is not Young Israel, he is not haredi, he is not someone who is looking to keep women in the mikvah/home (examples which are NOT reflective of my experience as a Jewish woman&#8230;not in the least).  Rabbi Linzer is fighting the fight&#8230;for you&#8230;  It is unfair and immature to place a set of sexist norms in the same sentence as Rabbi Linzer.  He was writing for the NY Times&#8230;not for The Jewish Week or Lilith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beit Shemesh, Religious Extremism, and the Dignity of Women:  Some Lessons from History by Bluebyrd</title>
		<link>http://www.lilith.org/blog/2012/01/beit-shemesh-religious-extremism-and-the-dignity-of-women-some-lessons-from-history/comment-page-1/#comment-88007</link>
		<dc:creator>Bluebyrd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lilith.org/blog/?p=3092#comment-88007</guid>
		<description>Coming from people who were looked down on because they were jewish and blacks because of their race, and now look down on others because of their sex?!  Of course we&#039;re all different - there&#039;s femine men and more masculine women - not because they&#039;re gay. Being with people who are different is uncomfortable at 1st untill we learn to relate to each other and see what we have in common. Learning to live in peace with our differences is what living is about.  Try it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming from people who were looked down on because they were jewish and blacks because of their race, and now look down on others because of their sex?!  Of course we&#8217;re all different &#8211; there&#8217;s femine men and more masculine women &#8211; not because they&#8217;re gay. Being with people who are different is uncomfortable at 1st untill we learn to relate to each other and see what we have in common. Learning to live in peace with our differences is what living is about.  Try it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Modesty and Desire by Pesach</title>
		<link>http://www.lilith.org/blog/2012/02/modesty-and-desire/comment-page-1/#comment-88005</link>
		<dc:creator>Pesach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lilith.org/blog/?p=3117#comment-88005</guid>
		<description>You seem to believe that there is inverse relationship between modesty and being the center of attention. Perhaps i haven&#039;t fully understood what you have written. 

The requirement for men to be the center of attention should still be a humbling experience for the individual in that position. A true leader can be the center of attention whilst not letting his ego interfere with that job. 

It seems to me that is the understanding of modesty that Rabbi Linzer&#039;s was explaining in his article. Your perspective on this is flawed in my opinion.

My apologies if I have read your article incorrectly and misrepresented you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to believe that there is inverse relationship between modesty and being the center of attention. Perhaps i haven&#8217;t fully understood what you have written. </p>
<p>The requirement for men to be the center of attention should still be a humbling experience for the individual in that position. A true leader can be the center of attention whilst not letting his ego interfere with that job. </p>
<p>It seems to me that is the understanding of modesty that Rabbi Linzer&#8217;s was explaining in his article. Your perspective on this is flawed in my opinion.</p>
<p>My apologies if I have read your article incorrectly and misrepresented you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Modesty and Desire by Joshua Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.lilith.org/blog/2012/02/modesty-and-desire/comment-page-1/#comment-88004</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lilith.org/blog/?p=3117#comment-88004</guid>
		<description>great article, tara.
re: men and tznius, i think actually all of these articles are missing a very important component of ultra-orthodox culture, in which the language of tznius is deployed specifically to refer to regulations re: men&#039;s dress as well.  now, of course, tznius is still a discourse largely devoted towards regulating women&#039;s bodies and behavior, but in the hasidic world, men are not supposed to wear jackets which are too short or pants which are too tight, since they are not deemed tzniusdik.
i actually think the backhanded egalitarianism present in this case provides us with an opening to discussing tznius which jibes with feminist ethics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great article, tara.<br />
re: men and tznius, i think actually all of these articles are missing a very important component of ultra-orthodox culture, in which the language of tznius is deployed specifically to refer to regulations re: men&#8217;s dress as well.  now, of course, tznius is still a discourse largely devoted towards regulating women&#8217;s bodies and behavior, but in the hasidic world, men are not supposed to wear jackets which are too short or pants which are too tight, since they are not deemed tzniusdik.<br />
i actually think the backhanded egalitarianism present in this case provides us with an opening to discussing tznius which jibes with feminist ethics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

