Beit Shemesh, Religious Extremism, and the Dignity of Women:
Some Lessons from History

by David Ellenson

Vera Weizmann voting in Israel's first elections

The recent contretemps in Beit Shemesh riveted the Israeli public and brought worldwide attention to the misogynistic treatment accorded women in the public square by certain sectors of ultra-Orthodox Israeli society.  As is by now well-known, some ultra-Orthodox Jews there hurled insults and engaged in bullying an eight-year-old Orthodox girl named Naama Margolese for dressing “immodestly” on her way to school.  These same Jews also rioted when public street signs situated in an area inhabited by a population of ultra-Orthodox, Orthodox, and secular Jews that instructed women to dress according to their particular standards of modesty were removed.  In recent months, ultra-Orthodox sensibilities have also led to the creation of bus routes where women are segregated and consigned to the back of the bus.  On some public ceremonial occasions, women have been prohibited from singing lest their voices offend male listeners and on other occasions when women have sung there has been the spectacle of rabbis placing their hands over their ears to block out their sound.  These episodes of Jewish religious extremism unconscionably objectify women and are absolutely incompatible with the democratic and egalitarian values upon which the State of Israel was founded.

This is not the first time such conflict between sectors of the ultra-Orthodox community and the other Jewish citizens of the State of Israel has been manifest.  Indeed, such clashes predate the State itself.  The ways in which secular and especially Orthodox religious leaders spoke out and acted in those cases provide models for how I would hope that present-day Israeli and Jewish religious leaders would respond to the concerns these events in Beth Shemesh and elsewhere evoke.

In 1917, the British Mandatory Government in Palestine decided to create a Jewish Assembly that would govern the affairs of the Jewish community, and an Elected Assembly was to be chosen.  On December 28, 1917, the committee charged with responsibility for the first Elected Assembly decided that members of the Elected Assembly should be chosen through direct election in which all men and women above the age of twenty then living in Palestine would vote. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Feminists in Focus:
Reporting back from the New York Jewish Film Festival
Mission Accomplished for ‘Bottle in the Gaza Sea’

(Check the calendar for the festival, presented by The Jewish Museum and the Film Society of Lincoln Center, at www.thejewishmuseum.org/nyjff2012, through Jan. 26. For the Brooklyn Israel Film Festival Jan. 26-29, go to http://kanestreet.org/iff/.)

What a coup for the most political film at this year’s NY Jewish Film Festival – “A Bottle in the Gaza Sea” — to make its world premiere at the festival. And how encouraging to see that fresh and touching ground remains to communicate the message that the bloodshed between Israelis and Palestinians is too inhuman to continue.

Tal, a teen whose family has moved from France to Jerusalem, slips a message into a bottle saying that she refuses to accept that only hatred can exist between Israelis and Palestinians. She gets her brother to throw the bottle into the ocean while he’s on army duty near Gaza. An e-mail response to “bottleaccess” eventually comes from “Gazaman.”

The resulting e-mails  become poignant when terrorist attacks in Jerusalem are met with Israeli air strikes in Gaza.

The film is based on the award-winning novel of the same name by French writer Valérie Zenatti, who spent her teen years in Israel. (Her earlier book, “When I Was a Soldier,” about her life in the Israeli army, was reviewed in Lilith.)

Speaking at the film’s premiere, Zenatti  said the novel grew out of her refusal to blame either side in the conflict.

“Bottle” combines bloodshed and death with the delicacy of the unfolding e-mail relationship between Gazaman Naïm and Tal, whom he addresses as Miss Peace. Thanks to the Israeli co-producers, French director Thierry Binisti was able to film in Israel, with Arab neighborhoods standing in for Gaza. Binisti explained that Gaza remains off-limits to outsiders except for journalists and humanitarian organizations.

Both sides of the story are convincing, with Tal, a teenager coming of age in a comfortable middle class home, experimenting with liquor and body    piercing and experiencing a terrorist bombing in her local cafe. Naïm’s life is limited to hanging out with his smartass friends and cousins and delivering T-shirts for his uncle, with life punctuated by gruesome bombings from Israel and brutality from the Gaza cops.

For these young men, Tel Aviv women are long-legged with beautiful eyes. Naïm laments he’s only seen the covered-up women of the religious settlement where he worked. Not all that different from Israeli women, Naïm’s mom is a supportive, cigarette-smoking worker at the local hospital. But it’s still a man’s world. When Naïm’s cousin marries, we see the groom in a suit and tie and the beat-up white wedding limo but no sign of the bride. What does manhood mean for Gazans? Pre-wedding, the groom-to-be tells Naim that he’ll finally become a man. Continue reading

Posted in Feminists In Focus | Tagged | Leave a comment

Muslim and Jewish Marriage Contracts in American Courts

As someone whose interest in secular law grew out of my studies of Jewish law, I’ve always been especially fascinated by the ways in which the two systems of law interact. A recently published article, “How To Judge Shari’a Contracts: A Guide To Islamic Marriage Agreements In American Courts,” got me thinking about some of the parallels and common experiences between Jews and Muslims in interacting with secular American courts.

Some Jewish Examples

Last month I was reading a case (Tsirlin V. Tsirlin, 2008) about an Israeli Jewish couple living in New York. The wife asked the husband for a get, the Jewish bill of divorce, and he gave her one in front of a Brooklyn Beit Din (Jewish court). The husband’s father brought the get to an Israeli court, on the strength of which the Israeli court issued a decree of divorce for the couple. Shortly afterward, the husband later filed for divorce in New York, also seeking orders for custody/visitation and child support. The wife moved to dismiss the action for divorce on the grounds that the New York courts should recognize the Israeli divorce. Judge Jeffrey Sunshine ruled that:

“If this court were to sanction the utilization of a ‘Get’ to circumvent the constitutional requirement that only the Supreme Court can grant a civil divorce, then a party who obtains a ‘Get’ in New York could register it in a foreign jurisdiction and potentially, later on, rely on the ‘Get’ to obtain a civil divorce in New York thereby rendering New York State’s Constitutional scheme as to a civil divorce ineffectual… It would have the practical affect [sic] of amending the Domestic Relations Law section 170 to provide a new grounds for divorce.”

In this case, the wife tried (and failed) to use Jewish law and legal procedures to get out of the application of American laws about divorce, personal status, division of property, and child support/custody.  More common, at least recently, is for American Jews to try to use American law to get out of the application of Jewish laws about divorce. Specifically, Jewish law would permit a husband to be separated from his wife, even to have a civil legal divorce from his wife, but continue to withhold a religious divorce – leaving her an agunah, religiously unable to ever marry or have sexual relations with anybody else and rendering any future children of hers mamzerim, ritual bastards. Rabbis, including prominent Orthodox rabbis, have collaborated to create civilly enforceable prenuptial contracts (like the RCA contract), according to which the husband would be liable to pay his wife a certain amount for each day that they are civilly but not religiously divorced, or at least would be legally obligated to appear in front of a Jewish court.

Islam and American Law

American Muslims, like American Jews, are a religious minority with a strong religious legal tradition that does not really line up at all with American family law, which grew out of a secular Christian history. I was glad to come across a relatively new article that explains, in accessible terms, some of challenges and opportunities that American Muslims have been encountering (and attempting to exploit) when interfacing their personal status laws with American marriage and divorce law. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Link Roundup:
Remembering Roe v. Wade

Welcome to this week’s installment of Lilith’s Link Roundup. Each week we post Jewish and feminist highlights from around the web. If there’s anything you want to be sure we know about, email us or leave a message in the comments section below.

http://www.flickr.com/dukeyearlook

Marking the 39th anniversary of Roe v. Wade approaches on January 22nd, National Council of Jewish Women CEO Nancy K. Kaufman explained why women should continue to “guard against efforts to roll back choice.” The Guttmacher Institute reported that in 2011 individual states introduced more than 1,100 anti-choice proposals, 135 of which were enacted in 36 states. [The Forward]

On Friday, the Obama administration rejected requests made by the U. S. Conference of Catholic Bishops to exempt religiously affiliated employers from the Affordable Care Act’s requirement to cover the full cost of contraception in employer-sponsored insurance plan. Religiously affiliated institutions that currently do not cover contraception will have until August 2013 to do so, while houses of worship will remain exempt from the new law. [Ms. Magazine]

In a bold move, the Israel Medical Association (IMA) barred its members from attending the PUAH Institute’s annual fertility and halacha conference because the event excluded female speakers. The PUAH Institute responded to the boycott by announcing its plans to host a women-only conference over the summer, leading author Elana Sztokman to criticize the organization inadequate “separate but equal” solution. [Jerusalem Post] & [The Sisterhood]

In an Op-Ed (in a decidedly secular newspaper), Rabbi Dov Linzer revealed that according to the Talmud, it is up to men to control their own sexual urges, as opposed to forcing women to dress modestly. Linzer added, “At heart, we are talking about a blame-the-victim mentality. It shifts the responsibility of managing a man’s sexual urges from himself to every woman he may or may not encounter.” [NY Times]

Female Torah scribe Hanna Klebansky shared how she uses her work to combat gender segregation in Israel. [Haaretz]

For more coverage on the latest news stories, follow us on Twitter at @LilithMagazine.

Posted in Link Roundups | Tagged | Leave a comment

Feminists in Focus:
Reporting back from the New York Jewish Film Festival
Peeling Away the Layers of ‘Restoration’

(Check the calendar for the New York Jewish Film Festival, presented by The Jewish Museum and the Film Society of Lincoln Center, at www.thejewishmuseum.org/nyjff2012. The festival runs through Jan. 26.)

Finely crafted is the operative phrase for “Restoration.”  The 2010 Israeli film (English subtitles) directed by Joseph Madmony tells the tale of Fidelman, an aging restorer of antique furniture stubbornly trying to hang onto his business. Starring Sasson Gabai (“The Band’s Visit”), “Restoration” unfolds with exquisite twists and turns that won it the Dramatic Screenwriting Award at this year’s Sundance Film Festival and several prizes at the Jerusalem Film Festival. (Madmony collaborated with Erez Kav-El on the script.)

Set in a timeless corner of Tel Aviv, it takes cell phones and a digital camera with video option to make clear we’re in the present.

Enter Anton (Henry David), the mysterious drifter who becomes Fidelman’s assistant. Add  Fidelman’s estranged son, Noah (Nevo Kimchi), and his very pregnant wife, Hava (Sarah Adler). And there’s the impact beyond the grave of his freshly deceased partner, Malamud, who managed the shop’s finances.

“Restoration” is a tale rich in ambiguities. As furniture gets stripped down, the characters add layers of complexity.  Fidelman’s lawyer son wants to jettison his father’s workshop for a  lucrative real estate deal. More betrayal, the drifter gets involved with the son’s wife.

The scenes are composed with painterly control – dark interiors with luminous faces in a sea of blues and greens. Close-ups with one of two characters partially cutoff. Out-of-focus edges framing a scene.

The soundtrack is a major player. Music from a string quartet of elderly sidewalk musicians is layered with the sounds of furniture restoration.  Hardly harkening back to an idyllic age, the reverberating basement tones of the cello are cut against the violent planing of wood. Continue reading

Posted in Feminists In Focus | Tagged | Leave a comment